How to deal with Muslim extremists

There can scarcely be a sillier idea than the government’s recent plan to house all extremist Muslims prisoners in one unit. This is a sure way to make them all more fanatical than ever before.  It’s to be hoped that better counsel will prevail sooner rather than later

But before considering what should be done with them what is the point of locking them away anyway?  Is it to prevent them carrying out acts of terrorism?  Or is it for retribution reasons?  Or is it to rehabilitate them?

As far as the generality of criminals is concerned, the lesson has already been learned over the years of over-crowded prisons and constant recidivism.  At the end of the day, rehabilitation must be the only option to be treated seriously — or the main one, anyway.  Rehabilitation may be expensive while it lasts, but it is far less expensive than nearly 70% of ex-prisoners committing crimes again and having to be prosecuted and returned to prison.

The sure way of rehabilitating anybody with wildly aberrant ideas is to immerse them individually in a group of normal people — albeit not sitting around in ‘therapeutic’ groups and talking about their problems but actually to fold them into a group carrying out meaningful daily activities, or even on a long adventurous holiday.  There’s no need to persuade or force the individuals to change their ideology and become more normal.

Sooner or later — but no longer than a few weeks — the aberrant individuals will voluntarily adopt the culture of the group.  This is called the ‘Stockholm Effect’ among other terms, but it’s only another instance of any individual’s strong need to be fully socially acceptable into a group.  Neuroscientist researchers have recently identified a small part of the brain — which they term the ‘loneliness centre’ for want of a better term at present — which comes to life when a person feels lonely and drives him or her to find companionship.

2 thoughts on “How to deal with Muslim extremists

  1. Protection of the general populace and the scale of the group of outsiders are important factors in my view. Currently there are too many in the large throngs of immigrants to implement what you suggest. When small numbers trickled in to receiving countries, integration was likely if the new people were not already radicalized and if they were not persecuted once resettled.

    My two cents.

    1. Steve,
      You’re quite right. The ‘Stockholm Solution’ could not be applied to the large numbers of immigrants now invading the EU. The ideal solution there is that they should be carefully assessed before they enter. If anything, the apparently deserving cases of families with young children escaping from Syria, shoud be even more carefully assessed than the obvious ‘economic migrants’ because that would be a perfect method of Isis getting its jihadists into the EU.

      In my posting I was thinking of the way our government were treating convicted terrorists who have actually been born here. There have been, and are, about 30 of these. Most of them are young people who’ve become radicalized even though, in most cases, their parents and siblings are contented enough in Western culture and are aghast tbat one of their number should have been converted by Isis.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s